Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/09/07 08:53
Read: times


 
#142964 - idata is in small or compact???
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jan Waclawek said:
Denis B said:

– 256 Bytes Scratch Pad RAM

all the lower area is direct addressable (00-7F) "data", the upper area (80-FF) is indirect addressable ("idata").

JW



thank... i understood this before....

but in keil after compilation i see in "build window" next strings:

......
Program Size: data=16.2 xdata=137 code=20033
creating hex file from ...

question:
1. where is a "idata(128-255bytes)" in the string?
2. "idata(128-255bytes)" is in "small memory model" or in "compact"???



List of 41 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
keil - program and data size            01/01/70 00:00      
   Check file.M51            01/01/70 00:00      
      Linker Listing aka "Map" file            01/01/70 00:00      
         another question            01/01/70 00:00      
            8051 memory map            01/01/70 00:00      
               Keil documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
               AT89C51RD2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  a '51-specific buzzword: scratchpad RAM            01/01/70 00:00      
                     idata is in small or compact???            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Neither!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           1. where is a "idata(128-255bytes)" in the string?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        As previously advised - look in the Map File            01/01/70 00:00      
                           i understood            01/01/70 00:00      
                     IDATA and DATA            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it is correct            01/01/70 00:00      
                        my take            01/01/70 00:00      
            Pardon?            01/01/70 00:00      
               excuse me on my ENGLISH....            01/01/70 00:00      
                  What request?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     message suggests this            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I see no such suggestion there            01/01/70 00:00      
                           keil RECOMENDS            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Where?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 ok            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    These questions have all been answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       thank, but....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Oh yes you have!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             more thanks........ :-))))))))))            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Overinterpretation ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       yet            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Linker listing file.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             keil-128, at89c51rd2-256            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                More misinterpretation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   ok, thnx            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm confused!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           q            01/01/70 00:00      
                              attempt to a            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 previous A            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I know I was repeating what I've read in your post            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Confusion            01/01/70 00:00      
   reply            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List