Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/09/07 13:38
Read: times


 
#142984 - ok
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
Denis B said:
keil RECOMENDS to no use small and use compact....

Where did you see that recommendation?

If you post a link to it, maybe we can read it and interpret it for you?




:-))....
it is not a link....
then i started my design, i reads more advices....
and i choose SMALL memory model....
then i over than 128 variables, i got from keil:

*** ERROR L105: PUBLIC REFERS TO IGNORED SEGMENT
SYMBOL: ?C_IBP
SEGMENT: ?C?LIB_DATA
Program Size: data=146.3 xdata=0 code=18950
Target not created

and i made COMPACT model... i got:

Program Size: data=16.3 xdata=137 code=20156
creating hex file from .......


i think, that keil RECOMENDS compact !!!!!! it is all......

i asked:
1. where is a "idata(128-255bytes)" in the string?

ok, but according to data sheet:

• 80C52 Compatible
– 256 Bytes Scratch Pad RAM
• On-chip 1792 bytes Expanded RAM (XRAM)
– Software Selectable Size (0, 256, 512, 768, 1024, 1792 Bytes)
– 768 Bytes Selected at Reset for T89C51RD2 Compatibility

i asked:
keil after 128 bytes data in small memory model requests to move
to compact model, but where 128-255 bytes of idata??




List of 41 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
keil - program and data size            01/01/70 00:00      
   Check file.M51            01/01/70 00:00      
      Linker Listing aka "Map" file            01/01/70 00:00      
         another question            01/01/70 00:00      
            8051 memory map            01/01/70 00:00      
               Keil documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
               AT89C51RD2            01/01/70 00:00      
                  a '51-specific buzzword: scratchpad RAM            01/01/70 00:00      
                     idata is in small or compact???            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Neither!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           1. where is a "idata(128-255bytes)" in the string?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        As previously advised - look in the Map File            01/01/70 00:00      
                           i understood            01/01/70 00:00      
                     IDATA and DATA            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it is correct            01/01/70 00:00      
                        my take            01/01/70 00:00      
            Pardon?            01/01/70 00:00      
               excuse me on my ENGLISH....            01/01/70 00:00      
                  What request?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     message suggests this            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I see no such suggestion there            01/01/70 00:00      
                           keil RECOMENDS            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Where?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 ok            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    These questions have all been answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       thank, but....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Oh yes you have!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             more thanks........ :-))))))))))            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Overinterpretation ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       yet            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Linker listing file.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             keil-128, at89c51rd2-256            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                More misinterpretation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   ok, thnx            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm confused!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           q            01/01/70 00:00      
                              attempt to a            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 previous A            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I know I was repeating what I've read in your post            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Confusion            01/01/70 00:00      
   reply            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List