| ??? 02/02/08 08:36 Read: times |
#150198 - Missing the point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Paul Blakey said:
Yea, I know the 8051 is kinda slow compared to ATmega I don't think that's even (generally) true (see Erik's post), but that wasn't the point. The point was that the requirement as originally (mis)stated was not a job for any 8-bit microcontroller! Anyway, I meant 256 bytes, 2048 bits. Yes, that makes a difference! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dual port static ram | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use Uc as master | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hardly a \'51 project, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 256 vs 256k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Concur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FIFO instead of 2 port SRAM? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stuck with the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are very wrong, sir | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So change the interface! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Damned good actuators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its a dc motor | 01/01/70 00:00 |



