??? 02/28/08 17:39 Read: times |
#151623 - RE: address your complaint to Dave Dunfield Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
I think it is evident, that William is NOT the author of the said source code. Quite so. If you did care to have a look at that source, I did - which is how I know it was missing the "essential" detail! you could not have missed the author's name. You're right - I didn't You know that "Dunfield" makes compilers, and I know that - but I don't think it should just be assumed that any reader would know it. So, you should in fact address your complaint to Dave Dunfield, http://www.dunfield.com/. I don't think so, really. If Dave Dunfield (or any other tool vendor) publishes his source code on his own website, I think it's fair enough to assume that it'll be for his compiler. But if someone else is to take that code and post it out-of-context on a different site, I think the least they can do is state what tools it was originally written for. Oh, and once you are on those pages, I think it is quite clear WHAT development tools is the said file intended for. Quite so - see above. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Serial Port and Hyperterminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try here... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART drivers .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Essential information missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
\'similar\' does not cut it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You should at least provide the information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the ultimate toolset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re Jans post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: address your complaint to Dave Dunfield | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My Opinion ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the missing words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy, of course, YOU don't need to complain... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And other drivers .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
.... a deep help | 01/01/70 00:00 |