??? 02/29/08 08:02 Read: times |
#151660 - Why Responding to: ???'s previous message |
William Thorp said:
It is not necessary to have the right compiler. Most assemblers and 8051 "C" compilers have similar syntaxs and directives, 8051 mnemonics are very standard. The important thing is to understand how a particular operation could be performed. Analyze the source code and try to write your own sources using your favorite compiler or development kit :) William William Thorp said:
- I forgot to post it was for dunfield compilers, this is my error but looking in very few lines of code is quite easy to understand which is the compiler it was written for. I hope Carlos is already running his first RS232C Loop-back program William Why do you contradict your statement. He who understands C is capable of adjusting small errors no matter what compiler , just give me any code and any compiler I wont face any problem . Carlos for his site http://www.engemed.com/ doesnt looks a newbie to me atleast. AP PS: Each thread is different and to generalize it for everybody is no good thing. This is a forum not a GOVERNMENT . |
Topic | Author | Date |
Serial Port and Hyperterminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try here... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
UART drivers .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Essential information missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... Compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
\'similar\' does not cut it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You should at least provide the information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the ultimate toolset | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re Jans post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: address your complaint to Dave Dunfield | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My Opinion ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the missing words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy, of course, YOU don't need to complain... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
And other drivers .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
.... a deep help | 01/01/70 00:00 |