??? 03/13/08 01:53 Read: times |
#152198 - Here is the block which now works 100% Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've got my block working, and doing what I want it to do. I'm sure it could be simplified but it is not really needed. I found out that I should have used:
unsigned int SR; instead of unsigned char SR; So it was a ma bad situation. Here is the final result, my next post after this one will be an operational question that doesn't make sense. Thanks for the input folks. unsigned char S1,S2,S3,S4,S5,S6,S7,S8,S9,S10,S11,S12,S13,S14,S15,S16; //input samples from ADC unsigned int SR; // Sample end result value unsigned char size; // ADC conversion variable SR = 0; // Initialize sample results variable Wait(1); //16X sampling of incoming data from potentiometer S1=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); //Wait 10mS for next sample S2=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S3=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S4=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S5=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S6=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S7=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S8=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S9=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S10=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S11=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S12=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S13=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S14=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S15=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); S16=AD1DAT2; Wait(1); SR = (S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 + S9 + S10 + S11 + S12 + S13 + S14 + S15 + S16); SR = (SR / 16); size = SR; // Local SR = Sampled result average |
Topic | Author | Date |
Math not functioning with proper headers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
horrible method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lots of issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code Op at level 8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try multiple steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ah hah moment arrived......omg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
01/01/70 00:00 | ||
Here is the block which now works 100% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Operation question in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what's the point ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
simpler, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use shift right instead of divide | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you're lucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a rount trip buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bad names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
System use names ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Common naming convention ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ISO/IEC 9899:1990... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same effect as a "circular array" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
think I like this the best | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a loop with deglitching and averaging![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |