| ??? 03/13/08 13:56 Read: times |
#152229 - simpler, but Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Who needs an array?
Your code is, indeed, simpler; however I have always used the array, not because I want it more complex than what you show, but to have the ability to get a look at the distribution of the reads in the debugger. Now, of course, had I not believed in the NASA principle, I could "go your way" in the production release. another advantage of the array approach is that you can avarage after each read. Also, if you do not have ICE (functionality) the array approach may be moot. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Math not functioning with proper headers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| horrible method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lots of issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Op at level 8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try multiple steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah hah moment arrived......omg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| Here is the block which now works 100% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Operation question in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's the point ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simpler, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use shift right instead of divide | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're lucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a rount trip buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| System use names ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common naming convention ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISO/IEC 9899:1990... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same effect as a "circular array" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think I like this the best | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a loop with deglitching and averaging | 01/01/70 00:00 |