| ??? 03/13/08 12:42 Read: times |
#152220 - what's the point ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
why not just replace the lenghty stuff. This is, I believe, the first time I have seen averaging done without putting the values to be avceraged in an array
something like U8 values[16];
U8 index;
for (index = 0; index <16 ; index++)
(
readADC (values[index]);
}Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Math not functioning with proper headers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| horrible method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lots of issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Op at level 8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try multiple steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah hah moment arrived......omg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| Here is the block which now works 100% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Operation question in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's the point ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simpler, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use shift right instead of divide | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're lucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a rount trip buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| System use names ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common naming convention ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISO/IEC 9899:1990... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same effect as a "circular array" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think I like this the best | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a loop with deglitching and averaging | 01/01/70 00:00 |