| ??? 03/13/08 01:59 Read: times |
#152200 - Operation question in C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
ok, the above block does what I want. Now here are two seperate yet should be the same operational code segments.
Below does NOT work as "add all/divide by 16" SR = ((S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 + S9 + S10 + S11 + S12 + S13 + S14 + S15 + S16)/16); Below DOES work as "add all" then "divide by 16" SR = (S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 + S9 + S10 + S11 + S12 + S13 + S14 + S15 + S16); SR = (SR / 16); Structurely and by order of precidence they should yield the same result but in Keil they do not. Not even close. Why? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Math not functioning with proper headers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| horrible method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lots of issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Op at level 8 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try multiple steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah hah moment arrived......omg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | ||
| Here is the block which now works 100% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Operation question in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simplify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's the point ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simpler, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use shift right instead of divide | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're lucky... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a rount trip buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| System use names ???? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Common naming convention ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISO/IEC 9899:1990... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same effect as a "circular array" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think I like this the best | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Use a loop with deglitching and averaging | 01/01/70 00:00 |