Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/13/08 02:09
Read: times


 		 #160002 - Why do you think 64TB would be enough?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Until they find a way to put, say, 64 TB or so of ram on a chip, someone will always complain that he needs "more core."

The most likely reason for someone to put 64TB of RAM on a chip would be to allow it to run the next-next version of Windows. But the problem is of course that if they let this fact out to M$, then the next-next version of Windows will no longer fit in 64 TB since M$ likes to "consume" a hardware way before someone actually sells it.

List of 34 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
a simple SETB question            01/01/70 00:00      
   SETB from 20h to 2FH            01/01/70 00:00      
      assembler missed this one            01/01/70 00:00      
         I know of none that can't            01/01/70 00:00      
   what about this?            01/01/70 00:00      
      try ORL to set any bit in internal RAM            01/01/70 00:00      
         wrong, nonstandard and why            01/01/70 00:00      
            ORL, Set any bit (more informative)            01/01/70 00:00      
               iram            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Where is that defined?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     my word was not 'defined' but            01/01/70 00:00      
                        a rose, by any other name ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I think Erik has it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              aliased/overlayed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Fair enough            01/01/70 00:00      
                              pDATA?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Why do you think 64TB would be enough?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    It would not be            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Tools are important for size            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          That's why there's ASM to use instead            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       this flies against some previous posts of yours            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It's like herding cats            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Flame bait?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                No ... not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 PDATA & XDATA            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I won't argue that ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Agreed, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It is seldom that simple ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             That's the point!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             since you are really interested            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, that is the way I normally do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      WHY TO DISTURB ACC ?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List