Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/13/08 07:05
Read: times


 
#160006 - I won't argue that ... but ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yes, the off-chip RAM high-address-byte appears on P2, on most chips (not necessarily on SiLabs) but it's really addressed by DPTR and not by P2. You can, of course, write a byte to P2 and use it as the high address using R0 or R1 to provide the low byte. DPTR is faster, though.

It's getting messy, as 805x architecture expansion continues, and we need to be very precise with nomenclature in order to avoid mixing up details such as where the memory lives, physically, with how it's addressed.

SiLabs provides 8 KB of what's addressable as external memory. Maxim/Dallas provides that 1 KB buffer, and, IIRC, some NXP parts provide half-a-kB of on-chip data memory of some sort, but I've got no idea how it's addressed. I suspect NXP's is split up in some peculiar way ...

The trick is to keep things straight in our collective understanding, so that when we refer to a given thing, it's clear to everybody what is meant.

RE


List of 34 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
a simple SETB question            01/01/70 00:00      
   SETB from 20h to 2FH            01/01/70 00:00      
      assembler missed this one            01/01/70 00:00      
         I know of none that can't            01/01/70 00:00      
   what about this?            01/01/70 00:00      
      try ORL to set any bit in internal RAM            01/01/70 00:00      
         wrong, nonstandard and why            01/01/70 00:00      
            ORL, Set any bit (more informative)            01/01/70 00:00      
               iram            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Where is that defined?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     my word was not 'defined' but            01/01/70 00:00      
                        a rose, by any other name ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I think Erik has it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              aliased/overlayed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Fair enough            01/01/70 00:00      
                              pDATA?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Why do you think 64TB would be enough?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    It would not be            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Tools are important for size            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          That's why there's ASM to use instead            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       this flies against some previous posts of yours            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It's like herding cats            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Flame bait?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                No ... not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 PDATA & XDATA            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I won't argue that ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Agreed, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It is seldom that simple ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             That's the point!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             since you are really interested            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, that is the way I normally do it            01/01/70 00:00      
      WHY TO DISTURB ACC ?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List