| ??? 08/11/02 20:28 Read: times |
#27092 - RE: Port problems with AT89C52 |
it is an RETI to 'kill' an unused interrupt, some compilers insert those (beneficial items) automatically, I insert them manually.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



