| ??? 08/11/02 20:55 Read: times |
#27095 - RE: Port problems with AT89C52 |
"On the very first line, somehow an extra 0x32 was written at the 12th byte that wasn't in the sdcc hex file. Is that normal?
" SDCC (shorter form without "blanked device chars"): :0400000002004F3279 :01000B0032C2 Programmer (full form include "blanked chars"): :1000000002004F32FFFFFFFFFFFFFF32FFFFFFFF46 There is no problem with 0x32 at the 12th byte I believe It's only different listing type after flash loading to your programmer . http://www.8052.com/tutintel.phtml Vaclav |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Port problems with AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 |



