Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/22/02 07:23
Read: times


 
#27682 - RE: Visual Basic and 8052. to andy
Craig,
Your words best expressed what I wished to say. Despite the speed of execution VC gives, developing GUI in VC++ etc is quite tedious and sometimes complex. Which is why Microsoft came up with VB and its drag-and-drop interface for UI design I suppose ;-))

However, as I said, the reason VB is so slow is that it does everything over COM, which actually goes through a lot of function calls to get a pointer to the actual function to be called, and involves numerous Windows Registry search overheads.

This .NET and C# phenomenon (VB, C and all in one language/ IDE ) is probably a similar scenario... there will be many overheads involved, although development will be extremely easy. Unless Microsoft provides an extremely good optimizing compiler, or some faciliy for the programmer to optimize his code, it will be slower than ever. It can only be used for E-business applications, where cumbersome compiler output can be compensated with faser and more expensive hardware :-))

I've heard a lot about Delphi in similar discussions on other forums too... Hmmm, I think I should take a look at Delphi. I haven't the faintest clue what it's all about or its applications.

kundi

List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: to Kunal Kandekar            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and C            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052.            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052. to andy            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052. to andy            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: to Kunal Kandekar            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Visual Basic and 8052. to andy            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List