| ??? 09/26/02 22:39 Read: times |
#29734 - RE: But why?? |
Because the assembler section was only a rough set of I2C routines and I needed to have the confidence that I could work in assembler should the need arise.
I find code is easier to maintain in C, but perhaps thats just a personal preference. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: SRC :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanx Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |