| ??? 10/02/02 23:47 Read: times |
#30073 - RE: SRC :-( |
"Right now it is easier to write a function in all assembler than fight through .SRC and all that stuff."
Using ".SRC and all that stuff." means that you lose all 'C' source-level debugging for the whole file Therefore I agree with Erik: it's far better to write your function in Assembler than to use Keil's inline assembler in 'C' :-( However, Erik would also suggest that the SRC directive is an excellent way to start your assembler function - getting the Compiler to create a template for you. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: SRC :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanx Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



