| ??? 09/29/02 20:26 Read: times |
#29843 - RE: But why?? |
I think mixing assembly with C gives you the best of both worlds. Although C on its own is good enough.
I'm jealous, I will use my atmel for pager decoder project and try to mix c with assembly. I'm sure i will have difficulty at first but will post any problems i might face in here. Mahmood |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: SRC :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanx Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |