| ??? 10/02/02 20:58 Read: times |
#30065 - RE: Erik |
If you plug in some assembly, keil optimization would be less efficient and you might be losing few ms and bytes here and there.
1) so what, you optimized ultimately (used assembler) the very critical part. 2) if your assembler is in a separate module from the C (and how can that not be), you will not lose ANY optimization. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: But why?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Andy/Mahmood | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Calling assembler interrupts from C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: SRC :-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanx Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 |



