| ??? 11/30/02 23:17 Read: times |
#33494 - RE: Living in the past? |
I also don't like big IDE's that much. I like and am used to xemacs, don't much like many other IDE editors.
A good editor, make, grep and a decent compiler ... that's all you need really. Only stuff I can't fix with xemacs under Windows is that it gets upset when it thinks teh file has changed on disc, and it insists on opening with a useless DOS window. Off to another newsboard to ask why ... I also think that SDCC is quite well documented, and at least if you have a problem there are plenty of folk to ask. I just haven't gotten around to getting it settled in properly. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My thoughts exactly... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Present | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? (Craig / Rob) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Living in the past? (Craig / Rob) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An example of why we prefer REAL editors | 01/01/70 00:00 |



