| ??? 05/23/03 19:13 Read: times |
#46502 - RE: 8051 peripherals choice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Stephane and Kai, before I go any further I would like to reiterate the fact that I am still an engineering student and the experience I have is from a relatively short period of time compared to most of the other people here. I don't want to mislead anyone who is making important design decisions for 1 billion products. These are my ideas only.
With that out of the way, I have a few thoughts. I went to Atmel's page and looked at their line of automotive serial EEPROMs. Products like the AT24C01A operate from -55 C to 125 C. Not bad. Stephane, have you looked at ST? They have several R&D and industrial centers in France. Their line looks even better - automotive serial EEPROMs like the M24C01 operate up to 150 C (bare die version, otherwise the top range is 125 C). I requested retention vs. temperature information from them, but it is from my Yahoo account so they may not take me seriously. In my designs I always use this multistoring technique to increase redundance. Even when working with the parallel ones. So, I believe that EEPROM will never make trouble BEFORE Flash code memory does. The approach taken should depend on the probability of failure. While a blanket approach could reduce the chance of bad data, it could be inadequate or simply unnecessary depending on the actual system. I wonder if maybe this is not a serious concern as evidence by the lack of available information? I would go directly to manufacturer and INSIST on specifications. Tell them, otherwise you will burn down their factory... {grin} The latter is not a recommended approach. I don't know if that works where Kai is from, but it is a good way to go to prison in the US. You could give ST a call right there in France. - Lee |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 peripherals choice | 01/01/70 00:00 |



