Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/16/03 20:43
Read: times


 
#48542 - RE: Harvard Architecture
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I guess the answer is that the Harvard Architecture was put out as an abstract concept. As with all abstract concepts, some engineer has to make it work in the "real world". In this case it would have taken probably 100 pins or more to package the 8051/52 family as a true Harvard Architecture device. It would not have been cost effective for the market that Intel was targetting for this device, they already had the higher cost 80x86 market. So with the cost constraints and the abstract concept was born the 8051/52 family. I don't about the rest of you guys, but this chip continually amazes me at what it can do, considering it is only an 8 bit chip!


Jacob


List of 37 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Harvard Architecture - Why            01/01/70 00:00      
   Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Back to square one            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Back to square one - Caveat lector            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Back to square one - Caveat lector            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Harvard Architecture            01/01/70 00:00      
      Humpty Dumpty            01/01/70 00:00      
         Sat on a wall            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Sat on a wall - oops            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Sat on a wall - oops            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Sat on a wall - Mike            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List