Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/01/03 20:08
Read: times


 
#49809 - RE: RE 1232 supervisors
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I think what's unclear is what "fall off" means?
It means does not pass test the board must pass for me to accept it.

Do you let your contract manufacturer make engineering decisions as to which parts are responsible for failures ?
The contract manufacturerer has been given a test the board must pass, if it does not pass, the CM is responsible for making it pass (repair or replace).

Erik

PS the extract is from an e-mail asking if substituting a better part is OK and am I willing to pay a few more cents to compensate for the price differential.

List of 45 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
               Circuit vs. chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Circuit vs. chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Here we go again!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 93C46 serial EEPROMs are different.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Thread decay            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         No Apollo flight!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: No Apollo flight!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: No Apollo flight nor a bed of roses            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List