Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/04/03 05:49
Read: times


 
#50047 - No Apollo flight!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
First, I want to thank you both for your thoughtful and expert responses on a wide range of subjects. It's always a pleasure, and I usually learn something.

Thank you very much, Dave. That's a very nice compliment from such an experienced person like you!

Anybody know why this always happens? How come we can't have a nice quiet technical discussion without all of the shouting and invective that seems to develop?

That's a difficult question, and I must confess, that I'm not free of emotions, either, from time to time. I think we are all too much ego. Regarding to our potential of aggression, I stronlgy believe that most of use would never have been allowed to join an Apollo flight. Rocket would never have had a lift-off, because of too much offendings and insultings during countdown: 'No, you stupid idiot, that's not a red light, it's an orange one!'... {grin}

I can only make a guess: If you are in a group of ten people, and you are the one who has the best solution. Do you think, that other 9 people would automatically accept your knowledge, wisdom and authority, and say: Oh, yes, Dave, that's a brillant solution...'? I don't think so! What happens is just the opposite: 'No, no, Dave, we cannot see that complication.' Or: 'You must always see problems where no ones are, Dave', etc, etc.
Reality is like that: You must convince the others, which might mean to fight some heavy struggle and to use your elbows. Means, you will develop a strong ego after some time.

Would be highly interested, what our female members think about this point.

Bye,
Kai

List of 45 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                           RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                              RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RE: RE 1232 supervisors, Charles            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             RE: Be realistic, Charles!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors, not clear!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
               Circuit vs. chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Circuit vs. chip?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: RE 1232 supervisors            01/01/70 00:00      
   1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Here we go again!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: 93C46 serial EEPROMs are different.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Thread decay            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: 1232 supervisors are very different!            01/01/70 00:00      
         No Apollo flight!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: No Apollo flight!            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: No Apollo flight nor a bed of roses            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List