| ??? 07/07/03 16:02 Read: times |
#50224 - RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Peter Dannegger wrote:
------------------------------- Exactly, the lock bits are intended for, that all further programming operations except the full erase may fail. So reading all ones is the correct behaviour? Then I just have to figure out why the chip behaves (in the actual circuit) like it was programmed with all ones after setting the lock bits... Right now I use the same algorithm and timing for programming the lock bits, as I do for programming the data area. Is that what I'm supposed to do? The description in the data sheet is not too clear. Best regards, Mikkel C. Simonsen |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AT89Cx051 lock bits - update | 01/01/70 00:00 |



