Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/20/03 09:03
Read: times


 
#59085 - RE: Bug in keil C51 ?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
@ME BA

You are absolutely right. The opposite behaviour must be a bug !

If a result of an expression can not be changed by the remaining terms, then the remaining terms are not allowed to be executed, e.g.:

if( getkey() && busy == 0 )

or

if( busy == 0 && getkey() )

have a different working.
The first expression throw away any second key pressing if already busy.
But the second expression allow to start it again, during the action was still busy.


Peter


List of 8 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Bug in keil C51 ?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List