| ??? 11/20/03 09:03 Read: times |
#59085 - RE: Bug in keil C51 ? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
@ME BA
You are absolutely right. The opposite behaviour must be a bug ! If a result of an expression can not be changed by the remaining terms, then the remaining terms are not allowed to be executed, e.g.: if( getkey() && busy == 0 ) or if( busy == 0 && getkey() ) have a different working. The first expression throw away any second key pressing if already busy. But the second expression allow to start it again, during the action was still busy. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Bug in keil C51 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 |



