| ??? 11/20/03 15:21 Read: times |
#59135 - RE: 89c55wd bad choice Responding to: ???'s previous message |
patrick de groote wrote:
------------------------------- erik, I admit, I haven't (yet) compared the chips you suggested, but you must have some valid reasons for your statement. Any chance I (we) get to know them? MY 2 cents worth ? 1.) Atmel processors have a nasty reputation for being buggy. 2.) The serially loaded modern variants are MUCH better than the parallel parts. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd bad choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd bad choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd bad choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ouch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89c55wd bad choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89c55wd project question. | 01/01/70 00:00 |