| ??? 12/09/03 22:24 Read: times |
#60269 - RE: 89C51RC and Keil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
want to switch to 89C51RC
89C51RC is, as far as I know an 'old' derivative, why not go for the latest? Anyhow ..RC is diffrent from manufacturer to manufacturter so who made the chip you refer to? and give the WHOLE name of the chip Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Add. info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Add. info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 89C51RC and Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| once more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: once more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: once more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: once more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: you are right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: you are right | 01/01/70 00:00 |