Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/03/04 23:16
Read: times


 
#61860 - RE: Sbuf value \\\\\\\\
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Stanley,

Is your interrupt routine really so long in duration that a second serial byte has arrived before returning?

Are you running with a low frequency Xtal?

Or is the latency of your response to the 1st byte's serial interrupt equal to the long period of time it takes to frame a serial byte? (38.4kbps = ~260 µ seconds).

regards,
p


List of 12 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Sbuf value "refresh"?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Sbuf value "refresh"?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Sbuf value \\            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Sbuf value            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Sbuf value            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Sbuf value \\\\\\\\            01/01/70 00:00      
      ***Details***            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: ***Details***            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Sbuf value "refresh"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Sbuf value \            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Sbuf value \            01/01/70 00:00      
         Silly problem solved...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List