Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Issue successfully resolved

???
01/21/04 16:16
Read: times


 		 #63078 - RE: MISRA C Guidelines
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Stated..

Designing anything that control brakes on a limited budget will probably end you in jail for manslaughter.


Thsi is an area where the watchdog/reset approach becomes critical.
The most favoured xx1232 type cannot be used as the standard 500ms delay will enable a vehicle at 70mph to travel 20(ish) yards extra,if the uC resets when the brakes are applied. At this point the uC becomes truly embedded.
There are examples in the UK of companies being prosecuted for manufacturing devices that fail due to poor watchdog arrangements (under EMC regulations).


List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Jack Ganssle on the MISRA Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List