Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Issue successfully resolved

???
01/23/04 11:07
Read: times


 
#63189 - RE: Not guilty, mlud
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"And any language in which
for(;P("n").R-;P("|"))for(e=3DC;e-;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);

Compiles cleanly should be banned."

This looks like it's been taken from the obfusticated 'C' competition. No sane programmer would write code like that.

In any case, you've been a bit unfair to 'C' as your example is incomplete without the appropriate declarations which would at least make it possible to figure out what it does.

List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Alternate C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Not guilty, mlud            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Hitex have a deal...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Jack Ganssle on the MISRA Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: MISRA C Guidelines            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List