| ??? 02/02/04 15:07 Read: times |
#63850 - RE: Suggested to learn C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Donald:
In all due respect...If I was a manager at a company that had an embedded project to do that was on a critical path or was the key part of the technology that we were staking the company's life blood on I would NEVER hire an embedded programer to work on it that only knew C and was not proficient in the underlying assembly language. Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Suggest me one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Combined Compiler & Assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Properties or usages? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You know what you need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8052 - for university? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8052 - for university? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Suggested to learn C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Suggested to learn C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Suggested to learn C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Suggested to learn C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: C and ASM - which one is better for... | 01/01/70 00:00 |