Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/04 09:44
Read: times


 
#65003 - RE: good atmel & bad atmel
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi,
...about reliability.
Look at datasheets of MSC-51 devices from Philips or at Cygnal - as example. They have no Erratas! Look at Atmel site: most devices have their Erratas, most ones have datasheets changed time to time; they do it not for fix typpos but to insert some additional "notes". IMHO, if a vendor needs to indicate additional requirement which is opposited to its description in the datasheet, then they must do it in Erratas but not insert some new lines in main datasheet.

Indeed, Atmel chips are cheap but think about: may the good thing be cheap? It was not me who asked it first time.

Regards,
Oleg

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         Erratas makes sense!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List