Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/04 14:18
Read: times


 
#65022 - RE: good atmel & bad atmel
Responding to: ???'s previous message
from Philips or at Cygnal - as example. They have no Erratas!
That is not correct, they do. However, the list is usually a whole lot shorter than the aTMEL LIST.

I praise chip vendors for publishing errats so we can know what to look out for and not spend time debugging something that is not our fault.

Now, my beef with Atmel re erratas: They are the slowest I have ever experienced in admitting a problem and publishing it. I once reported a problem to Atmel, was told I was off my rocker, but more than 1 YEAR later it was published in an errata.

Erik

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   Correction            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Errata            01/01/70 00:00      
         Erratas makes sense!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: good atmel & bad atmel            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List