| ??? 04/28/04 00:46 Read: times |
#69359 - RE: Down memory lane Responding to: ???'s previous message |
erik malund said:
With todays derivatives there is NO lower limit for the clock frequency, there may be a lower limit for the internal oscillator frequency and I am sure there is a lower limit for crystal frequencies. There's an echo in here: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=69186 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Down memory lane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Down memory lane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mHz, MHz, kHz, KHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: mHz, MHz, kHz, KHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Talking rubbish again! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: mHz, MHz, kHz, KHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: what is the slowest crystal for 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It depends on what you really mean | 01/01/70 00:00 |