??? 07/15/04 13:48 Read: times |
#74297 - RE: devellopement kit Responding to: ???'s previous message |
On Windows the commandline stuff is treated as the "worse category" and is way On Windows the commandline stuff is treated as the "worse category" and is way less comfortable to use and either you use the "legacy" MS DOS style communication that has been in stasis for nearly 10 years, or you just have to use some GUI.
I have no idea what you are talking about. What is "less comfortable" about a command "makms" (an actual one of mine, if it runs under another OS. I have no problem with Linux users, (if the tools had been available in a TRUE Linux version, I might have switched myself), but how can it be "less comfortable" to run in native mode under Windows (commandline or not) than through a 'code converter' (Wine). I am not arguing against Linux, but do not treat it with religious fervor, it is just another OS. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is not the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: this is not the question![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: devellopement kit | 01/01/70 00:00 |