??? 07/21/04 12:05 Read: times |
#74558 - RE: Memory devices for 8051_Compress? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I am also on one such project. I have a small idea on which I would like to get some inputs from members. In a typical data logging setup, there are some channels which are relatively slow as compared to rest - for instance a temperature channel where the values almost remian constant for a large number of samples.
It will be exteremly confusing if you makes some data log in one way and some in another. Why not make all data storage a byte count followed by a value. Even fast changing data should sometimes achieve a count. This, of course, means that after 256 identical readings of a temp you will store it again, but is it really worth it to makes extremely complicated code to save a few bytes, after all you can buy 2Mbytes of flash for ~$3 (see above). Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Memory devices for 8051_Compress? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051_Compress? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051_Compress? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run-Length Encoding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Precious Memory? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Memory Clarifications - Erik & Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OTish ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OTish ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: OTish ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory devices for 8051![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |