Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/10/04 14:19
Read: times


 
#75696 - RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC
Responding to: ???'s previous message
hi,

2) For timing conditions, lcall executes one cycle longer than acall, that may be the cycle that breaks sync with outside IO

No. Both take the same time.

Regards,
Oleg

List of 20 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. ACALL            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. ACALL            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. ACALL            01/01/70 00:00      
      eval            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: ASM works not C PART 2: LCALL vs. AC            01/01/70 00:00      
   \            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: \            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: \            01/01/70 00:00      
            Reply to off-topic comments...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Reply to off-topic comments...            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Reply to off-topic comments...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hardware bug?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Testing C program results...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Testing C program results...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Testing C program results...            01/01/70 00:00      
         The Next Step...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List