??? 08/19/04 08:24 Read: times |
#76156 - RE: debouncing code using vertical count Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I used the same way, a blank sheet of paper and a pencil to develop my routine.
Then I placed AND, OR, NOT, EXOR and connections on it with the limitation of only 2 inputs for every gate. Then I optimized it for a minimum count of wires (= register) and logic gates or connections (= instructions). I think this is the typical way for erstwhile hardware logic developers. That this solution was named "vertical counters" I have only seen recently. Peter |
Topic | Author | Date |
debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |