??? 08/19/04 08:42 Read: times |
#76157 - RE: debouncing code using vertical count Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hans van Pelt wrote:
------------------------------- And if I may be so bold, as a comment on your original code, you are sampling p1 TWICE in the same code. This is not advisable, as the value may change between the samples. I spotted that as I coded it, but left it. sorry. Anyway, a fine hack, I like your better CPL operation ! Thanks. Looks like we need an 8052.com CVS now. Steve |
Topic | Author | Date |
debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical count | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: debouncing code using vertical counters![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |