??? 10/08/04 12:10 Read: times |
#79018 - RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Some time late Atmel published this problem in separate document which
Interesting, there have been posts about The Philips "H" chips having this problem ending with "I am going to switch to Atmel". Anythow, it seems that the advice I have been giving "buy a supervisor or a bottle of aspirin, you will need either" is much more universal than I thought. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Reset in AT89c51 RD2-ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Reset in AT89c51 RD2-ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Reset in AT89c51 RD2-ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Reset in AT89c51 RD2-ED2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I will inform.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Works as is spected! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Works as is spected! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Problems with Atmels BOR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Reset in AT89c51 RD2-ED2![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |