??? 12/03/04 19:48 Read: times |
#82494 - 16M derivatives... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm not sure on this, but I remember something like that... Maxim on its derivatives that can use up to 16M of program memory in "flat" mode included "extra byte" to be considered while using AJMP and LJMP, so AJMP took 2 bytes and LJMP - 3. SJMP was still 1-byte for short jumps. |
Topic | Author | Date |
sjmp vs ajmp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
as you said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Different jmps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:AJMP, SJMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AJMP is 2 bytes LJMP is 3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LJMP was not the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AJMP vs SJMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relocable. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re:Relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
relocatable - not in a 51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Relocatable Code is Valid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not JMPs, relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I can anticipate all kinds of situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If I can devise concepts others will too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"driver". | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... maybe not.![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16M derivatives... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SJMP is 2 bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe he means additional bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 |