| ??? 12/03/04 20:10 Read: times |
#82496 - Maybe he means additional bytes Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Bartosz: SJMP was still 1-byte for short jumps.
Erik: SJMP is 2 bytes! Maybe he meant the number of bytes in addition to the instruction opcode itself. Regards, Craig Steiner |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| sjmp vs ajmp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| as you said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Different jmps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:AJMP, SJMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AJMP is 2 bytes LJMP is 3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LJMP was not the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AJMP vs SJMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relocable. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re:Relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relocatable - not in a 51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Relocatable Code is Valid | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not JMPs, relocatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can anticipate all kinds of situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If I can devise concepts others will too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "driver". | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... maybe not. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16M derivatives... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SJMP is 2 bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe he means additional bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes. | 01/01/70 00:00 |