| ??? 12/20/04 13:58 Read: times |
#83520 - question does not make sense Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Your impression to 8052, your reason to use of 8052, your comparison 8052 with others
For what it is intended for the '51 shines, for everything else it stinks. If you compare a '51 to a x86 for spreadsheet application, the x86 get to the goal even before the '51 is out of the gate. However, if you compare a '51 to a x86 for a control app, the result is that the '51 wins by the same margin. Thus your question "comparison 8052 with others" does not make sence. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| advantages of 8052 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ubiquity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| All much the same.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where are 8051's used? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| question does not make sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Context | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Different Look :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmmm... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bill based on sq.cm.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Size? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| compiler independency !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exactly! | 01/01/70 00:00 |