??? 12/27/04 16:55 Read: times |
#83948 - accuracy Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you need a precisely repeated time, but the actual time is not important, a way to achieve accuracy would be to let the timer run and just use the time a full rollover takes.
Also you can quickly stop and read the timer and subtract the count from the reload. In that case you only need to calculate the time lost in the stop - calculate - load - start sequence. Otherwise use timer 2 which allow a 16 bit reload. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Interrupt latency calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Constant = variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes that's correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16-bit auto-reload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Performance Analyzer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Accuracy, thats the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bad order | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correction Timer2 not Timer1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Timer2![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |