| ??? 12/28/04 09:36 Read: times |
#83968 - Timer2 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm not too sure if Shahzad has grasped the implication of using Timer2. If we use Timer2 in the auto-reload mode, the interrupt latency does not become a problem - thus his problem is solved. The example he gives is not using interrupts as he samples the overflow flag in the main code. Either method is equally effective depending on the requirements. Personally I would use Timer2 and the interrupt - it is not going to affect the accuracy of the timer. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupt latency calculation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Constant = variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes that's correct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16-bit auto-reload | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Performance Analyzer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accuracy, thats the question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| accuracy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bad order | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| correction Timer2 not Timer1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Timer2 | 01/01/70 00:00 |