| ??? 01/11/05 00:38 Read: times |
#84705 - Re: Why don't you ask Philips? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And now the C problems. The two files include line like this one:
interrupt(1) using(1) void T0_Interrupt(void) Well, that is clearly not Keil C51 syntax! No, that's what I figured out also :) I was hoping someone would recognise that syntax... A strange line in the main file was this:
_rom unsigned char UCFG1 _at (0xFD00) = 0x7B; /* 6 clock - internal 6 MHz brownout = 2,5V */ That looks like something for the programmer? What makes you say that? Normally you can setup these options with the programmer - I have just never seen it in the code before. Does anyboady know what compiler/assembler Philips uses?
Are you sure you have no documentation that specifies this? If not, it is certainly pretty poor of Philips to use vendor-specific syntax without specifying the vendor! There is no documentation, period! The code is described (in general terms) in the application note, but there's no readme file or similar describing how to compile the code. Have a word with your contact at Philips. If (s)he wants someone to make a Keil-compatible version of this (or maybe just to document the vendor-dependencies), you may give him/her my details... I don't have a contact at Philips... I just asked for the "code file" mentioned in the application note, and received a zip file with no further documentation. Best regards, Mikkel C. Simonsen |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Philips sample code/Keil problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: useful App Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: 87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linked! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Linked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dunfields or Tasking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2D Array problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler can deduce size. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can, but doesn't have to! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fully Bracketed Initializers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C99 vs. C90 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler deducing array size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking Compiler deduces array size! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which Array? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That Array! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One More Test | 01/01/70 00:00 |