| ??? 01/15/05 14:17 Read: times |
#85012 - That Array! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the Tasking Demo compiles this array without complaining, and the generated data looks right: char key_tbl1[][] =
{
{ 4, 3, 2, 1 }, // row 0
{ 8, 7, 6, 5 }, // row 1
{ 12, 11, 10, 9 }, // row 2
{ 16, 15, 14, 13 }, // row 3
};
Jon Ward said:
What about this array? char key_tbl[][] =
{
{ 1 }, // row 0
{ 2, 3 }, // row 1
{ 4, 5, 6 }, // row 2
{ 7, 8, 9, 10 }, // row 3
};
No, it rejects that. It gives Error E143 "Too many initialisers" once on row 1, twice on row 2, and thrice on row 3 In a quick scan (searching the PDF), I couldn't see anything about this in the Manual. Jon Ward said:
Clearly, the compiler cannot process the data in sequential order. It must go back and adjust the number of items in each preceeding row for each new row processed. It looks like Tasking just assumes that the first initialiser must fully initialise all the elements of that "row"? Jon Ward said:
After reading the C99 specification, I'm not convinced that initializations of multidimensional arrays with more than one unspecified dimension are addressed ... Since this would be a completely new feature of the language, you would think that the C99 specification would include a few examples of such a thing. It doesn't. My thoughts exactly! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Philips sample code/Keil problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: useful App Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: 87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linked! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Linked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dunfields or Tasking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2D Array problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler can deduce size. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can, but doesn't have to! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fully Bracketed Initializers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C99 vs. C90 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler deducing array size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tasking Compiler deduces array size! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which Array? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That Array! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One More Test | 01/01/70 00:00 |