??? 01/13/05 01:10 Read: times |
#84902 - C99 vs. C90 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
I do not have the full ANSI C specification here at my desk but I did find the following draft copy of the specification:
C9X Working Draft If you look into this in section 6.7.8 and then the subsequent paragraph numbers #17 to #22 you can see comments in the draft about array / structure initializers that are fully bracketed. That would be the Working Draft for what is the current C Standard ISO/IEC 9899:1999, which is also known as C99, would it not? To my knowledge, Keil C51 is oriented around C89/C90, not C99. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Philips sample code/Keil problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Why don't you ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Ask Philips? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: useful App Note | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: 87 89 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tasking. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linked! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Linked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dunfields or Tasking? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
2D Array problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler can deduce size. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
can, but doesn't have to! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fully Bracketed Initializers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ask Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C99 vs. C90 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler deducing array size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tasking Compiler deduces array size! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which Array? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That Array! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One More Test![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |