Leon,

Remember what Erik said, "You will never come across as dumb by using too many words describing a problem."
You still seem to be trying to cram your posts into the fewest number of words possible!
While we don't want to have to wade through a novel, a little more "meat" would be helpful!


Why?

As I said earlier, couldn't you access all three simultaneously?

When I implemented a system with two 1-Wire ports, it seemed to me that it was just as easy to have a driver for each port, rather than mess about trying to "paramaterise" it.
Thus, for each port, I had a set of three bit-level functions:

ul_reset() -- do a 1-Wire Reset

ul_write0() -- Write a '0'

ul_write1_readback() -- Write a '1' and read
This comes to <150 bytes per port.

Note that you don't need separate "Write-1" and "Read" bit-level functions: a Write-1 is the same as a "Read," but you just ignore the read value!

I also had a read-byte and write-byte per port - but you might want to "parameterise" these.