| ??? 01/18/05 11:38 Read: times |
#85182 - I had the same problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In my code I had three low level routines - send '1' bit, send '0' bit and receive bit. Each routine had 4 copies of the same code tailored for each 1wire bus (I had 4 busses). Not classy, but short of 'and'ing and 'or'ing and I limited the replicated code to the three routines. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| sbit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Dallas 1-Wire? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indirect bit addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The same iButton on all 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sbit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| access all 3 , one at a time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had the same problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lets try again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is always the switch statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| something like this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simultaneous example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use MASK rather than bit address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oooops, sorry... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multiple 1Wire | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post code, and possible hang-up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simultaneous? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| would even be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If it worked! | 01/01/70 00:00 |